Evidence Base
Each of the Too Good programs has undergone rigorous, independent evaluation studies to measure their effects on students' skills, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national evaluation conferences. These studies demonstrate the effectiveness of Too Good.
Evaluation Studies
The evaluation studies presented here have been conducted by third-party researchers and used randomized treatment-control group designs (pre-test/post-test, 20-week post-test, or one-year follow-up). The researchers examined pre-test equivalence between treatment and control groups; potential bias of loss of student data over time; quality of program implementation; and estimates of reliability and validity of assessment tools.
Too Good for Drugs
Too Good for Violence
2003 Summary
2003 Full Report
Too Good for Drugs
Too Good for Violence
Too Good for Drugs
Too Good for Drugs & Violence
Too Good for Drugs
Too Good OST
| Organization/Agency | TGFD | TGFV | TGFD&V |
|---|---|---|---|
| NREPP: National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs & Practices | Reviewed evaluation |
Reviewed evaluation |
Reviewed evaluation |
| Promising Practices Network: Programs that Work | Screened program |
Screened program |
Screened program |
| SAMHSA: Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration | Model program | Model program | Model program |
| What Works Clearinghouse: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science | Positive effects on behavior |
Positive effects on behavior & knowledge, attitudes & values |
Positive effects on behavior & knowledge, attitudes & values |
| CEBC: California Evidence Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare | TGFD Grade 6 Scientific Rating 2 - Supported by Evidence
|
Not Yet Rated |
Not Yet Rated |
| CASEL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning | Not Yet Rated | Elementary SELect Program
|
Not Yet Rated |